As I went on my walk around Thanksgiving Point for the accidental art assignment a few
questions came to mind. First, is creativity only expressed by conscious or
deliberate actions? The topic of “accidental art” would seem to suggest that
creativity does not require either of these things and I shot several images
that seemed to support this. However, another question popped up that
challenged this notion. Is it the person who notices and captures a scene who
is displaying creativity and not the scene itself? It’s similar to the idea
that if a tree falls in a forest and now one is around to hear it, is it a
sound? I could see people making an argument both ways but for me the answer
comes from a final question… If a person saw a random, interesting or
“creative” scene but chose not to capture it in any way and years later tried
to explain it to other people, would others say, “That is so creative?”
Probably not.
I like the idea that you present here. It is interesting to think about where the true art lies with accidental art... I would have to agree with you that it is with the person who notices and documents the art, because that is the person who saw past the mundane and found the beauty.
ReplyDelete